AI adoption is only the beginning. See the whole transformation.Explore the platform
litmus.AITalk to our team

THE LEADERSHIP REPORT

Know where to focus. Know what to do next.

A connected view of capability, barriers, business processes and recoverable time. Designed for decisions at team level.

INSIDE THE LEADERSHIP REPORT

The dashboard behind the decisions.

Explore the product screens: team fluency, recoverable time, barriers, workflows and follow-up campaigns.

The AI Litmus leader overview: your team is functional on AI at 60 out of 100, closing the gaps gives back 2.9 hours a week each across 459 people assessed, with cards for 459 of 509 people assessed, 1331 hours a week recoverable, weakest domain 43 in application, and 4 campaigns.
Where the organisation standsExample product report
A bar chart headed where the time is, recoverable hours a week by team largest first: marketing, operations, research, delivery, product, customer support, consultant, sales, finance and legal, with the product row hovered showing 135.2 hours a week.
Recoverable time, team by teamExample product report
Skill dimensions grouped by status: at risk, two of five, workflow integration 43 and critical thinking and judgment 43; watch, two of five, growth and team influence 60 and AI and tool literacy 60; strong, one of five, prompting and direction 76.
Five dimensions of AI fluencyExample product report
A gauge headed average AI maturity showing 60 out of 100, labelled functional, watch.
The AI fluency gaugeExample product report
A ranked bar chart headed what is actually blocking them, ordered time, trust, skill, access, relevance, policy and fear, out of the 459 conversations that carried a barrier.
What is blocking adoptionExample product report
A donut chart headed how ready people are, 459 with a read, split into 227 eager now, 141 willing and 91 not yet.
Readiness for the next stepExample product report
A donut chart headed what your team reaches for, share of everyone assessed who named each tool: ChatGPT 176 of 459, Claude 151, Canva AI 93, Notion AI 90, Gemini 87 and Perplexity 79.
Which tools people reach forExample product report
A team's week mapped in order as five numbered stages, plan, gather marked heaviest phase, build, check and send, each showing how many people pass through, how many are centred there, the hours a week and how many are using AI well.
The working week, stage by stageExample product report
An expanded workflow stage showing what happens here, what to use here with Excel Copilot already in use and Microsoft Copilot already paid for but nobody using it, what stays human, how far AI adoption has gone in this stage, plus one opportunity described by the team and one suggested by AI Litmus.
Inside an individual workflow stageExample product report
A ranked action list: focus the next workshop on application because it is the weakest domain at 43 out of 100, deploy the tools you already pay for because 231 people have access they are not using, and fix quality not access for 143 people hitting the tool's limits.
A prioritised action planExample product report
A board headed what did your people ask for, 36 ideas across 10 teams, split into 13 new waiting on you, 7 exploring, 7 planned and 9 archived, with an example idea to auto-draft the month end commentary.
Ideas raised by your peopleExample product report
A campaigns screen headed are you measuring the change, showing 4 campaigns, 509 people invited across all rounds, 459 conversations finished and 50 still to finish, above four campaigns with their completion rates.
Campaigns and progress over timeExample product report

WHAT A LEADER SEES

A report that leads to action.

  1. 01

    Where the organisation stands

    A clear summary supported by the measures behind it, with context for leadership conversations.

  2. 02

    Where the time is

    Recoverable hours by team help identify where to start.

  3. 03

    Capability, dimension by dimension

    Role-specific patterns show which skill gaps are shared across the team.

  4. 04

    What is holding people back

    Named barriers help distinguish a lack of time, trust, access or skill.

  5. 05

    Tools with unrealised value

    Understand which existing licences and tools people are not using or have not been shown.

  6. 06

    The process, stage by stage

    See where the hours sit, where AI is already integrated and what must stay human.

  7. 07

    The next action and its reasoning

    Prioritised recommendations connect back to the work and the ideas people raised.

  8. 08

    Whether anything changed

    A follow-up read shows movement after enablement rather than another disconnected snapshot.

ONE VIEW, CONNECTED

The numbers are only the beginning.

See the homepage overview for active AI users, automation opportunities, time-saving opportunities, processes mined and users interacting with Krish.

Explore the team overview

ADOPTION BARRIERS

Different barriers need different first moves.

Time and workflow

Find whether people need room to practise or a better way to fit AI into the actual sequence of their work.

Trust and judgment

Identify when confidence in outputs and verification habits need attention.

Skills and access

Distinguish a capability gap from a tool, licence or awareness issue before choosing a training response.

TRAINING READINESS

Choose the support that can land.

Use role-specific capability and the barriers people describe to decide who needs focused practice, workflow redesign, better access or a different first step. The leadership report connects recommended actions to the reasons behind them.

Read about role-based enablement

FURTHER READING

Go deeper on this question.

START WITH ONE TEAM.

A clearer picture.
A practical next move.

Bring your roles and the AI tools you already own.

Talk through your team’s next step

A QUICK REFLECTION

How well does your team use its AI tools?

On a scale of 1 to 10, where would you put your team today?

1 · Just getting started10 · Working really well